2D Groundwater Depth for Analysis of The Zone Unconfined Aquifer
Abstract
Abstract—Changes in land use have occurred quite significant in the city of Pekanbaru. The increasing of building spaces, the decreasing of plantations and forests are continues to grow with the increasing of population and industries. This means, it can cause impact on groundwater resources. This condition shall continue in effect, along with the population and industrial growth. This means, it can cause impact on groundwater resources of Pekanbaru City, thus the analysis of groundwater zone of Pekanbaru city is needed. The data used in this research is related with the biophysical and social economic. Data analysis method was using numeric simulation programming using finite difference method. The results showed that in 2016, its depth ranges between 16-46 m, this indicates that the unconfined aquifer was in trapped position but not included to the confined aquifer system. In 2017, it was predicted that the depth is about 6-38 m, and in 2018 the depth of unconfined aquifer will go deeper to 31,4-34 m. This is influenced by the changes of population and industrial and the automation of extraction of groundwater by those population and industrial is getting bigger. While in 2019 and 2020, the depth of the unconfined aquifer will be between 41,8-44,4 m and 44-46,8 m. It was predicted that the growth of population and industries will grow rapidly in the future. This rapid growth will cause the damage of the aquifer.
Keywords—Zone, groundwater, numerical method.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hutasoit, L. M., Groundwater Surface conditions with and without impregnation Made in Bandung Regional, Journal of Geology Indonesia. 2009, 0l.4, No.3, pp.177-188.
Mawardi, I., 2010. Damage Decreased Watershed And Carrying Capacity of Water Resources Efforts In Java And Handling, Journal Hidrosfir Indonesia, Vol. 5, No.2.
Juandi, M, 2012. Application of Basic Concepts resistivity to determine Conductivity the aquifer system, DIPA UR
Juandi, M, 2013 Application Geoelectric method to determine the material characterization of land based systems unconfined aquifer transmissivity coefficient in Pekanbaru, DIPA UR.
Juandi, M., Quantitative Models to Study the Soil Porosity as Function of Soil Resistivity, Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 2016, 6. Pp.253-262.
Adhikary, S.K., Chaki, T., Rahman, U.M., and Gupta, A.D., Estimating Groundwater Recharge Into A Shallow Unconfined Aquifer In Bangladesh, Journal of Engineering Science, 2013, 04(1), pp.11-22.
Laton, W. R., Whitley, R. J., and Hromadka, I. T. V., A new Mathematical technique for identifying potential sources of Groundwater contamination. Hydrogeology Journal, 2007,(15). Pp.333–338.
Neyamadpour, A., Samsudin, T., and Abdullah, W. A. T., An Application of three-Dimensional electrical resistivity imaging for the detection of undergrouand wastewater system, 2009,Geophys (53).pp. 389-402.
Wahyudi, H., Conditions and Potential Impact on Soil Water Utilization Bangkalan journal Applications, 2009, Vol.7, No.1. pp. 14-19..
Waspodo, R.S. B., Groundwater Flow Modeling In Aquifer Depressed Using Different Methods Up, Bulletin Technicality Agriculture, 2002, Vol.16, No. 2.
Subastaryo, 2003. Groundwater Management Model In Regions In Semarang District catchment basin. Semarang Java Central. Post Graduate Thesis, University of Diponegoro.
Abdulla, F., and Al-Assad, T.Modeling Of Ground Water Flow For Mujib Aquifer, Jordan, Journal Earth Syst, 2006, Sci, 115, No.3.pp. 289-297.
Ahmed, I., Umar R., Groundwater flow modeling of Yamuna-Krisni Interstream, a Part of Central Ganga Plain Uttar Pradesh, Journal Earth Syst, 2009, Sci, 118, No. pp. 507-523.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/ins.v1i1.10
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.